I recently came across a TED video
for my class this week, it was an interesting educational talk which pointed
out how different target groups work when tasked to complete a challenge in a
short amount of time. The task was called the “marshmallow challenge”, this is
a challenge which made like-minded groups of people come up with a structure
that can support a marshmallow in a matter of eighteen minutes. Tom Wujec, the creator
of the challenge used this exercise to see how these different groups of people
worked and why certain groups had the outcome that they did. Tom makes a comparison to the way that
kindergartners and MBA students work and to my surprise the kindergartners
out-performed the MBA students: I would almost say that the kindergartners made
fools of the MBA students.
Tom makes an analysis of the situation and
explains why the young kids did so much better. The result was that the kids
got straight to work and had a trial and error type of strategy, this proved to
be a good strategy for the kids. The MBA students had a completely different
approach they almost tried “too” hard, they would first jockey for power, try
to take charge and then come up with the perfect plan. This strategy seemed to
fail for many reasons but the most obvious being the fact that making the
perfect plan just takes too long. Tom makes a good point which I can agree with
when it comes to this challenge, sometimes the perfect plan is not needed for
every job in life. It is sometimes beneficial to just get the task done and try
to have the group work as one, a leader is not always necessary.
I think
that another reason why the kids worked so much better is for the simple fact
that they are not afraid to fail, this I can observe in my four year old son’s
behavior. As adults and especially as professional’s we tend to have a fear of
failing in front of others, this can cause people to over think projects. Kids
just want to have fun, be creative, and are not too concerned with pride; there
is definitely a lesson for adults to learn from this example.
There
was another group of people which did well at this marshmallow project and that
was the CEO’s with an executive assistant in the group. I believe that this is
the case because CEO’s are good at giving direction and assistants are good at
taking directions, there is no pride involved in this group. With this
combination no one is jockeying for power because they already know what the
roles of each person are, this creates more time to actually work at the task
at hand. The lesson that I can take from this group of individuals is the fact
that sometimes having an established leader or set of roles can have a huge
impact on how quickly a group can accomplish the work which they are doing.
The results of all of these
different groups were very interesting and I think that any of us can take away
a lot from these experiments. I think that if I were to facilitate my own
process intervention workshop I know that I would have to focus on a project
which can highlight the skills which are required in process intervention. I would try to show the importance of a group
which has a strong influence on task functions and also maintenance functions.
In other words I would make sure that my groups know that even though it is
important to work and complete the task, it is also important to make sure that
we have people in the group that are carrying out maintenance functions like
harmonizing to keep the group on track. This video has shown that we need a
good balance in a group and also the fact that a group with too many “Chiefs”
will not be successful in the long run. This is a lesson which I will carry through
my career and one that I have lived by for quite some time now; balance of
power in groups is essential to the success of a group.
Reference:
Wujac, T. (TEDS). (2010, FEBRUARY 10) Build a Tower, Build a
Team [Online Video]
Retrieved
from http://www.ted.com/talks/tom_wujec_build_a_tower#t-1820
No comments:
Post a Comment