Stewart Levine gives a road map
towards resolution in our text, in this book we talk about the craft of
resolution and different ways that we can work towards making a decision that
everyone will be satisfied with. One of the seven steps of resolution is called
“listening for a vision of resolution”, in this step we are taught to listen so
that everyone’s concerns may be heard. When we are getting stake holders
involved we are now listening to everyone that is part of the team and working
towards the best decision possible. When we are listening for a resolution that
benefits everyone, one of the questions which we have to ask is if the “preliminary
vision fits everyone’s view of the outcome” (Getting to Resolution pg. 137)?
This is an important question to ask because as stated before we want to make
everyone a part of the team. It is important to get the opinion of everyone who
has a stake in the organization because they have a different point of view
than you might have and diversity has been known to create good decisions.
At my job I am constantly faced with
many different situations, the job of a Rail Traffic Controller requires
someone to move trains in the fastest way possible across America while still
favoring priority trains. I have had situations in the past where I have needed
to collaborate with many different people that had a stake in the mission. I
was faced with a scenario where pushing a priority train would help us make
this particular trains scheduled goal; the only down fall was that it would put
into jeopardy making goal on about 8 non-priority trains. I gathered a team of
individuals who all had a say in the matter and we began to discuss the issue
at hand. Eventually we came to the conclusion that laying down the whole
railroad for one train was not the most practical solution and decided we could
make up some time on our priority train later on. This was an important
decision because we saved the company some money and we increased all of the stakeholder’s
bonuses in this instance. As a team we made a decision and stuck to it, we took
a risk but it was a risk that we all agreed upon which made our resolution much
better in the long run. Since we all came to the decision together there was no
bad blood between our groups.
There were many ways that including
the stakeholders helped us out in this situation. As I think about it I
realized that
-
We
were not worried about any repercussions because everyone was on board with the
decision.
-
We
had the investors on our side and happy to comply with the situation.
-
We
were given more leeway because all of the stakeholders knew what we were trying
to accomplish at the moment.
-
We
were much more efficient because we had a workable agreement, a shared vision
and minimized conflict.
-
We
were able to be much more creative with our options now that we had the
blessings of the stake holders.
In the long run, throughout this whole ordeal I knew that our
team work and collaboration helped us achieve our objective. When we brought in
everyone that would be involved we all felt a weight come off of our shoulders,
we no longer felt the pressure of making the decision on our own and having to
face the repercussions later on. We were able to focus and make the best decision
possible. The only other person I feel that could have added to the strength of
our team was our liaison between the company who’s product we were shipping and
our company, unfortunately he was not available on this day. Being able to keep
everyone informed is a key part of the resolution process.
This resolution process has shed light on many ways that I
have done business in the past. It has taught me many things I like to think
that I will use it in the future when working towards a resolution; I will make
it a point to have a positive attitude, listen to everyone and also include all
members. Sometimes taking on all the decisions yourself can be very stressful
and hurt everyone in the long run.
Reference:
Levine, S.
(2009). Getting to resolution: Turning conflict into collaboration (2nd
Ed.).San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
No comments:
Post a Comment